Unprofessional Conduct

Today’s offering is about how to fight back against medical greed and incompetency. I pursued the idea of suing  the whiteboys who fucked me over for money   the esteemed medical professionals who made profitable errors in judgment at my extreme expense, but because of the prejudice of lawyers who don’t want to bothered with psychos like me and my intolerance for being put on trial for having been medically raped, I had to step back from that idea.

At the moment I am very angry with every person I consulted about the medical abuse I endured, because in the 5 years since I walked away from The Provider not one medical or legal person, including the local advocacy program, ever suggested to me that I had the right to complain to the Vermont medical licensing board.

I have found a new doctor to assist me in obtaining medical care. He says his practice is based on “shared decision-making.” I talked to him about what the doctors had done to me, basically torturing and sickening me in order to drive out some putative brain disease, which apparently was more dangerous to me than the poison they coerced me into consuming. I could sense his discomfort at the idea of a malpractice suit. He suggested that maybe I could talk to my abusers  my former doctors about how I survived  and recovered from the poisoning  their treatment. Right.

But I am grateful that he pointed me in the direction of the medical licensing board. This, despite the emotional stakes I have in this situation, is not about me. It probably won’t have much effect, since it’s a self-policing system and the doctors who will investigate the complaint have the same deranged belief system as the men who attacked me mistreated me. But, I want to tell the fuckers the doctors to stop drugging sad women, scared and angry kids, and emotional men FOR MONEY. Stop it! Cut it out! You aren’t helping!

I’m going to file this post under the self-advocacy section.

I want to encourage you to speak up. If one door is closed, keep knocking on all the walls and doors and windows until somebody hears you.  Power concedes nothing without a demand, (says Frederick Douglass,) which is a request that you make from your inner power and authority and that you back up with action.

Here is a pdf of the complaint form for the medical licensing board of the State of Vermont.

§ 1354. Unprofessional conduct

(a) The board shall find that any one of the following, or any combination of the following, whether or not the conduct at issue was committed within or outside the state, constitutes unprofessional conduct:

(1) fraud or misrepresentation in applying for or procuring a medical license or in connection with applying for or procuring periodic renewal of a medical license;

(2) all advertising of medical business which is intended or has a tendency to deceive the public or impose upon credulous or ignorant persons and so be harmful or injurious to public morals or safety;

(3) [Repealed.]

(4) abandonment of a patient;

(5) habitual or excessive use or abuse of drugs, alcohol, or other substances that impair the licensee’s ability to practice medicine;

(6) promotion by a physician of the sale of drugs, devices, appliances, or goods provided for a patient in such a manner as to exploit the patient for financial gain of the physician or selling, prescribing, giving away, or administering drugs for other than legal and legitimate therapeutic purposes;

(7) conduct which evidences unfitness to practice medicine;

(8) willfully making and filing false reports or records in his or her practice as a physician;

(9) willful omission to file or record, or willfully impeding or obstructing a filing or recording, or inducing another person to omit to file or record medical reports required by law;

(10) failure to make available promptly to a person using professional health care services, that person’s representative, succeeding health care professionals or institutions, when given proper written request and direction of the person using professional health care services, copies of that person’s records in the possession or under the control of the licensed practitioner;

(11) solicitation of professional patronage by agents or persons or profiting from the acts of those representing themselves to be agents of the licensed physician;

(12) division of fees or agreeing to split or divide the fees received for professional services for any person for bringing to or referring a patient;

(13) agreeing with clinical or bio-analytical laboratories to make payments to such laboratories for individual tests or test series for patients, unless the physician discloses on the bills to patients or third party payors the name of such laboratory, the amount or amounts to such laboratory for individual tests or test series and the amount of his or her processing charge or procurement, if any, for each specimen taken;

(14) willful misrepresentation in treatments;

(15) practicing medicine with a physician who is not legally practicing within the state, or aiding or abetting such physician in the practice of medicine; except that it shall be legal to practice in an accredited preceptorship or residency training program or pursuant to section 1313 of this title;

(16) gross overcharging for professional services on repeated occasions, including filing of false statements for collection of fees for which services are not rendered;

(17) offering, undertaking, or agreeing to cure or treat disease by a secret method, procedure, treatment, or medicine;

(18) consistent improper utilization of services;

(19) consistent use of nonaccepted procedures which have a consistent detrimental effect upon patients;

(20) professional incompetency resulting from physical or mental impairment;

(21) permitting one’s name or license to be used by a person, group, or corporation when not actually in charge of or responsible for the treatment given;

(22) in the course of practice, gross failure to use and exercise on a particular occasion or the failure to use and exercise on repeated occasions, that degree of care, skill, and proficiency which is commonly exercised by the ordinary skillful, careful, and prudent physician engaged in similar practice under the same or similar conditions, whether or not actual injury to a patient has occurred;

(23) revocation of a license to practice medicine or surgery in another jurisdiction on one or more of the grounds specified in this section;

(24) failure to comply with the provisions of 18 V.S.A. § 1852;

(25) failure to comply with an order of the board or violation of any term or condition of a license which is restricted or conditioned by the board;

(26) any physician who, in the course of a collaborative agreement with a nurse practitioner allows the nurse practitioner to perform a medical act which is outside the usual scope of the physician’s own practice or which the nurse practitioner is not qualified to perform by training or experience, or which the ordinary reasonable and prudent physician engaged in a similar practice would not agree should be written into the scope of the nurse practitioner’s practice, shall be subject to disciplinary action by the board in accordance with chapter 23 of this title;

(27) failure to comply with provisions of federal or state statutes or rules governing the practice of medicine or surgery;

(28) practice of profession when medically or psychologically unfit to do so;

(29) delegation of professional responsibilities to a person whom the licensed professional knows, or has reason to know, is not qualified by training, experience, education, or licensing credentials to perform them;

(30) conviction of a crime related to the practice of the profession or conviction of a felony, whether or not related to the practice of the profession, or failure to report to the board a conviction of any crime related to the practice of the profession or any felony in any court within 30 days of the conviction;

(31) use of the services of an anesthesiologist assistant by an anesthesiologist in a manner that is inconsistent with the provisions of chapter 29 of this title;

(32) use of the services of a radiologist assistant by a radiologist in a manner that is inconsistent with the provisions of chapter 52 of this title;

(33)(A) providing, prescribing, dispensing, or furnishing medical services or prescription medication or prescription-only devices to a person in response to any communication transmitted or received by computer or other electronic means, when the licensee fails to take the following actions to establish and maintain a proper physician-patient relationship:

(i) a reasonable effort to verify that the person requesting medication is in fact the patient, and is in fact who the person claims to be;

(ii) establishment of documented diagnosis through the use of accepted medical practices; and

(iii) maintenance of a current medical record;

(B) for the purposes of this subdivision (33), an electronic, on-line, or telephonic evaluation by questionnaire is inadequate for the initial evaluation of the patient;

(C) the following would not be in violation of this subdivision (33) if transmitted or received by computer or other electronic means:

(i) initial admission orders for newly hospitalized patients;

(ii) prescribing for a patient of another physician for whom the prescriber has taken the call;

(iii) prescribing for a patient examined by a licensed advanced practice registered nurse, physician assistant, or other advanced practitioner authorized by law and supported by the physician;

(iv) continuing medication on a short-term basis for a new patient, prior to the patient’s first appointment; or

(v) emergency situations where life or health of the patient is in imminent danger;

(34) failure to provide to the board such information it may reasonably request in furtherance of its statutory duties. The patient privilege set forth in 12 V.S.A. § 1612 shall not bar the licensee’s obligations under this subsection (a) and no confidentiality agreement entered into in concluding a settlement of a malpractice claim shall exempt the licensee from fulfilling his or her obligations under this subdivision;

(35) disruptive behavior which involves interaction with physicians, hospital personnel, office staff, patients, or support persons of the patient or others that interferes with patient care or could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the quality of care rendered to a patient;

(36) commission of any sexual misconduct which exploits the physician-patient relationship, including sexual contact with a patient, surrogates, or key third parties;

(37) prescribing, selling, administering, distributing, ordering, or dispensing any drug legally classified as a controlled substance for the licensee’s own use or to an immediate family member as defined by rule;

(38) signing a blank or undated prescription form;

(39) use of the services of a physician assistant by a physician in a manner which is inconsistent with the provisions of chapter 31 of this title.

(b) The board may also find that failure to practice competently by reason of any cause on a single occasion or on multiple occasions constitutes unprofessional conduct. Failure to practice competently includes, as determined by the board:

(1) performance of unsafe or unacceptable patient care; or

(2) failure to conform to the essential standards of acceptable and prevailing practice.

(c) The burden of proof in a disciplinary action shall be on the state to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the person has engaged in unprofessional conduct. (Amended 1967, No. 307 (Adj. Sess.), § 6, eff. March 22, 1968; 1975, No. 249 (Adj. Sess.), § 2; 1977, No. 259 (Adj. Sess.), § 6; 1985, No. 163 (Adj. Sess.), § 3; 1989, No. 161 (Adj. Sess.), §§ 1, 2; 1991, No. 167 (Adj. Sess.), § 31; 1993, No. 190 (Adj. Sess.), § 6, eff. June 11, 1994; No. 201 (Adj. Sess.), § 4; 2001, No. 132 (Adj. Sess.), § 8, eff. June 13, 2002; No. 151 (Adj. Sess.), § 19a, eff. June 27, 2002; 2003, No. 34, § 3, eff. May 23, 2003; 2009, No. 103 (Adj. Sess.), § 19c, eff. May 12, 2010; 2011, No. 61, § 2, eff. June 2, 2011.)


About Madam Nomad

I survived 16 years of rape and battery in my family's house and when I ran away from home I was incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital. I was labeled and drugged with benzos and barbiturates. I ran away from there, worked as a private duty aide, had two kids, and then sued my parent for incest in 1985. In the same year Dr John Matthew of the Plainfield Health Center convinced me to take drugs for depression. I lost my mind, my soul, my heart and my health. I began the drug taper in 2007 and was able to completely stop the drugs in December, 2011.
Aside | This entry was posted in antipsychiatry, behavior-control chemicals, chemical injury recovery, iatrogenic injury, legal actions, psychiatric injury, violence against women, women and madness, women's health and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Unprofessional Conduct

  1. Michelle says:

    I hope you can and do sue.

    I wish I had sued the “hospital” where my son was in 2012. They exhausted me trying to get him out, and with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, well, I really wasn’t able to follow up on what I most certainly would have if I had been able. Outrageous lies were told. Laws were broken. Human and Civil rights completely ignored. They would have killed him if I hadn’t gotten him out when I did. Awful!

    It is terrible what happens to so many psychiatric patients.

    Wishing you well days, and the courage to always carry on. You have a strong voice and can make a difference as a result.

    • Madam Nomad says:

      Thanks for taking time to comment, I really appreciate it. It’s as difficult to get lawyers to take cases with labelled folks as I imagine it would have been for a black person to find a lawyer to help sue a slaveholder. Just not done.This shows the loss of status and credibility that happens upon being labelled.

  2. Michelle says:

    Your welcome, and I imagine your right about the lawyers, but then money is what gets a good lawyer. I learned about several ways of being heard, but I was truly too tired.

    The Department of Justice takes complaints fairly seriously, I think. At least, having a complaint in the files is good because surely, others will complain and one day a class action suit could happen. Maybe you could write to Human and Civil rights organizations, private non-profits, etc., Women advocacy organizations? I had a complaint about the way I was treated in a doctor’s office for a one time consultation. My family physician directed me to the Dean of Medicine.

    As to being labelled, it is true isn’t it. Stigma and devaluation…

  3. Holly says:

    Is it possible, in your opinion, to sue “The Vermont Department of Children and Families” (website: http://dcf.vermont.gov/fsd ) formerly known as “Vermont Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services” or “SRS”, for numerous mistreatments of, neglect of, and failure of protecting a child (myself) in their custody? Also included in this is the major fuck up that they did (guaranteeing my return to their custody) by allowing a family to adopt another child when one which they had adopted less than two years prior died. This adoption was not correctly processed before placement, and there was no follow up after placement, until child reported sexual abuse six years later. They fail kids so much and so often, it is time that they be confronted… I however would have no idea where or how to start. My adoption file is only available from the court with NON-identifying information, and I don’t know if the state still has their paperwork from their part in placing me in this abusive home.
    What steps can one take to start a process like this? I would appreciate any help and advice you may be able to offer.
    Thank you.

    • Madam Nomad says:

      Wow, Holly, you could call and discuss it with a lawyer. Why not? The actions of the agencies caused untold suffering to many people by their negligence. I don’t know of any lawyers offhand that would take this type of case. You could begin with a referral from the Vermont Law Board online and keep asking for referrals from the lawyers you talk to who tell you it can’t be done. Which is what I keep running into. Can’t sue the Empire, can’t fight City Hall and the Medical and Social Work Authorities.

  4. Thank you for your response. This is something I have considered for years but never really knew how to start the process. I will check into the Vermont Law Board and see what I come up with. I am learning however to never say “Can’t”, there is always a way – Or so I hope. Again thank you for your response.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s